This Is Appendix 153 From The Companion Bible.
Most "Harmonies" assume that because each Gospel
records an entry of the Lord into Jerusalem the four accounts must be
identical because they are similar: and therefore conclude
that because they differ in certain particulars there are "discrepancies".
1. In Matthew the Lord had actually arrived at Bethphage. In Luke He "he was come nigh" (engisen); in Mark "they were approaching" (engizousin). 2. In Matthew the village lay just off the road (apenanti); in Luke and Mark it was below them, and opposite (Katenati). 3. In the former, two animals were sent for and used; in the latter, only one. 4. In the former, the prophecy of Zechariah 9:9, which required the two animals, is said to have been fulfilled; in latter, the prophecy was not said to be fulfilled, and only so much of it is quoted (John 12:15) as agrees with it. 5. The former seems to have been unexpected,
for "all the city was moved, saying, 'What is this?' "
(Matthew 21:10,11),
while, if there was only one entry, the two accounts are inexplicable,
seeing that the later and subsequent entry was prepared for
: much people in the city "heard that He was coming", and
"went forth to meet Him" (John 12:12,13).
|